Hello Khem, no idea at the moment, I can't see anything wrong with this change. Please send me you config. Which version of toolchain (gcc/binutils) are you using and which arch fails?
Thanks, Peter -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:39:02 -0700 > Von: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > An: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Betreff: Regression caused by future merge utent.c, wtent.c: move functions > from utxent.c > > Hi Peter/Bernhard > > We have a regression on master which is that systemd does not boot the > system anymore > whereas it works fine with 0.9.33 branch so I did not bisecting and this > boiled down > to below commit. If I revert that then everything is working again. Please > take a look > what could be wrong here. The commit comment "The smaller size on utent.os > is unexpected, could be due to better inlining/not inlining" > does not effuse lot of confidence in this patch. I would ask to revert > this commit if > there is no easy resolution. > > commit 84135275cfeebc0b233c1c96eeada4d4178a0b18 > Author: Peter S. Mazinger <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Mar 15 15:29:14 2011 +0100 > > utent.c, wtent.c: move functions from utxent.c > > before the change (threads enabled) > text data bss dec hex filename > 1107 8 408 1523 5f3 libc/misc/utmp/utent.os > 152 0 0 152 98 libc/misc/utmp/wtent.os > 240 0 0 240 f0 libc/misc/utmp/utxent.os > after the change > text data bss dec hex filename > 1072 8 408 1488 5d0 libc/misc/utmp/utent.os > 157 0 0 157 9d libc/misc/utmp/wtent.os > 200 0 0 200 c8 libc/misc/utmp/utxent.os > > The smaller size on utent.os is unexpected, could be due to better > inlining/not inlining > > Signed-off-by: Peter S. Mazinger <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> > > > -- > -Khem _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
