On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Pirmin Walthert <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's ok for me (as the most important thing is not to have a regression in > the next release) but in fact the first of the following patches would have > been enough to fix the bug. However the second patch would have been the > preferred one, as there would be a potential memory-leak without it (in case > of m modifier and sc.width > 0). Hi Pirmin, Thanks for finding this bug. Both these patches look ok to me, although I guess they should be resent with a Signed-off-by (e.g. from git format-patch). _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
