On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Pirmin Walthert <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's ok for me (as the most important thing is not to have a regression in
> the next release) but in fact the first of the following patches would have
> been enough to fix the bug. However the second patch would have been the
> preferred one, as there would be a potential memory-leak without it (in case
> of m modifier and sc.width > 0).

Hi Pirmin,

Thanks for finding this bug. Both these patches look ok to me,
although I guess they should be resent with a Signed-off-by (e.g. from
git format-patch).
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to