On 5/9/2013 6:32 AM, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Il giorno 08/mag/2013 22:33, "ANDY KENNEDY" <[email protected]> ha
scritto:
-----Original Message-----
From: Carmelo Amoroso [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:36 PM
To: ANDY KENNEDY
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting statically built application using
backtrace.
Andy
I'll commit fixes forma backtrace with static applications tomorrow.
Thanks forma tour patience
Carmelo
Carmelo,
Okay cool! Can you tell me what you've found so far?
My next step was to disable the "New" way of doing the dl_hash. I've just
built a new config with that disabled and am completing the toolchain now.
We have actually fixed it. Static dlopen was broken
The patches fixes the infinite loop and extend the backtrace support in
statically linked app,
has been committed in master branch and cherry piched in 0.9.33 branch.
Moreover to properly build the libubacktrace you should manually apply
the patch posted in
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2013-May/047772.html
It will be committed shortly if no objections are raised.
Will that do what I'm expecting or am I off base (that is to say, you are
doing something that does NOT involve the whole libgcc_s.so.1 library)?
Still want to use libgcc
Thanks man. I'm being patient. I didn't know you were working on it. I
have been working on it since e-mail a week ago or so. I wasn't expecting
anything out of the developers of uClibc, but was attempting to fix
something and actually (for a change) contribute in place of just use ;).
Andy
Cheers
Carmelo
Cheers
Filippo
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
