On 9/13/2013 9:35 PM, Rajendra Dendukuri wrote:
I tried the patch and it looks good. I tried in our full blown application and
it works like magic!
Good. I'm happy to hear this.
/Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Filippo ARCIDIACONO
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ldso: exclude -fasynchronous-unwind-tables from ldso CFLAGS
At least on ARM, building the ld.so with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
for backtrace is creating a dependencies against libc through libgcc_eh.
So it needs to exclude this from the ldso cflags.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filippo Arcidiacono <[email protected]>
---
ldso/ldso/Makefile.in | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ldso/ldso/Makefile.in b/ldso/ldso/Makefile.in
index 91165c6..65f9a46 100644
--- a/ldso/ldso/Makefile.in
+++ b/ldso/ldso/Makefile.in
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ CFLAGS-ldso/ldso/$(TARGET_ARCH)/ := $(CFLAGS-ldso)
CFLAGS-ldso.c := -DLDSO_ELFINTERP=\"$(TARGET_ARCH)/elfinterp.c\" $(CFLAGS-ldso)
+CFLAGS-OMIT-ldso.c = -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
+
LDFLAGS-$(UCLIBC_FORMAT_DSBT_ELF)-$(UCLIBC_LDSO_NAME).so := -Wl,--dsbt-index=1
ifneq ($(SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG),y)
LDFLAGS-$(UCLIBC_LDSO_NAME).so := $(LDFLAGS)
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
