On Tuesday 15 October 2013 19:04:12 Khem Raj wrote: > On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi, > > > >>> The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall > >>> to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check useless. Fix it by > >>> using the result of the test instead. > > > > Mike> i think you should look at all the pread/pwrite changes in > > Mike> master. afaik, all issues are addressed there. > > > > Yes, possible. I'm trying to test the 0.9.33 branch to hopefully speed > > up the 0.9.33.3 release as there's quite some fixes pending, but it > > looks like some more stuff should get backported. > > > > Anybody else testing the branch? > > I would be interested if you try out latest master.
if master works, then we can cherry pick back the patches. but i'd like to know before we start that work :). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
