Hi Khem,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 10/31/13, 4:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thursday, October 31, 2013, Chris Zankel wrote:
I understand that there have been requests for a next release, and
it would be great if we could get NPTL support for Xtensa into
that release. Some library functions are only implemented in NPTL
and not the old linuxthreads library, so I see failures when
building some packages with buildroot.
while we have not deprecated lt.old it would be better that we do not
regress it otherwise if the patch to shared code is managable it
should not be a big problem
Just for clarification, the patches that we propose don't regress
anything (at least from what we tested, they shouldn't). What I was
trying to say is that some functions are currently only provided by NPTL
(clock_nanosleep, for example is only implemented in NPTL and lacking in
lt.old), so it would be great to get support for NPTL for Xtensa into
uClibc.
Thanks,
-Chris
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
