I don't know how this might relate to <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15119> (see <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-01/msg00084.html> and <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-02/msg00021.html> and the rest of that thread). But my preference for how to address this is definitely to move to unifying lowlevellock.[ch] files across as many architectures as possible - which requires someone to understand the differences and produce a careful analysis that shows what the best form for generic files is and what cases actually require architecture-specific files to override those generic files (preferably overriding only the bits that need overriding).
-- Joseph S. Myers [email protected] _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
