On July 24, 2015 9:17:27 AM GMT+02:00, Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >On Friday 24 July 2015 09:26 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On July 22, 2015 5:05:34 PM GMT+02:00, Alexey Brodkin ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >Hi Bernard, >>> >This patch indeed fixes problems with duplicate vfork in both libc >and >>> >libpthread. >>> >I'm wondering if there's a chance for this patch to be applied >still? >> Well, but it's wrong, isn't it. > >Is it ? It makes pthread also use the libc version. The only difference >between >them was pthread version had a small optimization which could be done >away >altogether with if u read thru the tread below. > >https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-05/msg00238.html > >> pt-vfork.o should instead live in, say, libpthread_nonshared.a and >be at the end of the libs so it is picked up by the linker when static >linking, no? > >Could be done that way too but not needed if above is sufficient.
Above makes RESET_PID superfluous, doesn't it. Care to send an updated patch? Thanks, > >-Vineet _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
