Jivin Phil Wilshire lays it down ...
> HI David,
> 
> Well that makes perfect sense. A nice problem solved.
> Thanks for the details.
> 
> Do we still need the UCLINUX_BUILD_USER=1 flags set then or can these go 
> away when all the make files work properly.

If you do it in tree,  then the makefile take care of almost everything
now.

Cheers,
Davidm

> David McCullough wrote:
> >Jivin Phil Wilshire lays it down ...
> >>Hi All,
> >>Has there been a change to make user/xxx_only ?
> >>
> >>This used to do the following
> >>
> >>  make -C user/test
> >>
> >>now it seems to do this.
> >>
> >>  make -C user test_only
> >>
> >>The latter is not as useful IMHO but I am interested in the reason for 
> >>the change.
> >
> >It was changed so that it works :-)
> >
> >Previously the only ones that worked were:
> >
> >     make user_only
> >     make lib_only
> >     make linux
> >
> >Otherwise the correct build environment (ie., user/lib or whatever) was
> >not setup.  By going via the user or lib Makefiles we can ensure the env
> >is setup for proper build on all uCLinux-dist targets.
> >
> >The user and lib Makefiles now understand _only targets are well,  thus
> >making it all work.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Davidm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> uClinux-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
> This message was resent by [email protected]
> To unsubscribe see:
> http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

-- 
David McCullough,  [EMAIL PROTECTED],   Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to