Actually, I did use the -uc0-big patch. A bug in the initial email I sent out...
Does anyone else have any insight on this? Thanks, Harry On 8/2/07, Gavin Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoth Harry Gunnarsson: > > I tried the 2.6.22 kernel on top of the full source package from Jan 30. > Essentially I do > > - untar uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.bz2 > > - delete linux-2.6.x directory > > - untar vanilla kernel linux-2.6.22.tar.bz2 > > - apply Greg's patch linux-2.6.22-uc0.patch ontop of the vanilla kernel. > > - rename linux-2.6.22 directory to linux-2.6.x and move it into the > uClinux distribution > > as replacement for the standard 2.6.19 kernel. > > You should probably be using the -uc0-big patch instead for dev > work. (-uc0 > is for submission to mainline, a different case.) > > Don't know if this'll solve your problem, but it's worth a shot. > > > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by [email protected] > To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev >
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
