I can confirm that the busybox msh runs well on a !MMU system.
On 07/08/2007, at 11:06 AM, David McCullough wrote:
Jivin Gavin Lambert lays it down ...
Quoth Steve Bennett:
I recommend using the busybox version of msh rather
than the standalone version. It has a few bug fixes as
well as some nice features such as command line completion
and history.
There's a standalone version too? I just assumed he was referring
to the
BusyBox version, since that's the one I'm using :)
Yeah, in:
user/sh
There used to be !MMU changes in the the standalone version that were
not in the busybox version. Not sure what the state of it all is now,
Cheers,
Davidm
--
David McCullough, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ph:+61
734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://
www.cyberguard.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
--
WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd
W: www.workware.net.au
P: 0434 921 300
F: 07 3102 9221
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
