Jivin Matt Waddel lays it down ... > Hi, > > If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I > know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even > so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel > panic.) Any ideas or is this the best option available? > > Regards, > Matt > > The target platform is an M5329EVB and the kernel is > 2.6.22-uc1 in release 20070808. > > # ./nano-X & > 150 > # ./nano-X > BUG: failure at mm/nommu.c:451/add_nommu_vma()! > Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
Could be related to all the 2.6 mmap changes and nano-X mmapping the frame buffer ? You are right though, shouldn't crash, no ideas here though, Cheers, Davidm -- David McCullough, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ph:+61 734352815 Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
