Hi Greg,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:14:44PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
> >after compiling busysbox from uClinux-dist-20071107, I tried running
> >it in my previous uClinux environment/kernel - but with no success.
>
> Did you just take the busybox binary itself - not the complete
> generated user space/root filesystem?
as already stated in the other answer: yes, I just took the binary
itself. I can now mount a root filesystem generated from romfs, so
I am more flexible.
Thank you for the hints about what further testing I can do - for the
moment the problem is gone (with all the fiddling around, I do not
know what made the change, but now the header information in both
files is almost the same:
user/busybox/busybox
Magic: bFLT
Rev: 4
Build Date: Wed Nov 21 10:37:29 2007
Entry: 0x44
Data Start: 0xfc40
Data End: 0x126b0
BSS End: 0x12e60
Stack Size: 0x4e20
Reloc Start: 0x126b0
Reloc Count: 0x793
Flags: 0x1 ( Load-to-Ram )
user/test/test
Magic: bFLT
Rev: 4
Build Date: Wed Nov 21 09:21:59 2007
Entry: 0x48
Data Start: 0xadc0
Data End: 0xaf30
BSS End: 0xc0a0
Stack Size: 0x40000
Reloc Start: 0xaf30
Reloc Count: 0x41a
Flags: 0x1 ( Load-to-Ram )
My next problem is to get the current kernel running - I am using U-Boot
as the bootloader, and there seem to be some differences on the idea who
has to initialize which parts. ;-)
(Already chenged the interrupt initialization, but there seems to be
another thing that sometimes prevents the kernel from starting.)
But I think I will figure out that one, too.
Regards,
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
