* Greg Ungerer | 2008-04-03 16:47:58 [+1000]: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Greg,
>> This is because we register & enable way more interrupt sources than we >> actually handle. FEC_ENET_RXF (packet received), FEC_ENET_TXF (packet >> trasmitted) and FEC_ENET_MII (mii command done) are handled by the ISR. >> In my case FEC_ENET_RXB caused this because it was not handled, registered >> and >> rarely the only flag in the status reg. Registering an interrupt source >> without >> enabling it is also pointless. >> This patch removes them all except the three that are handled by the isr. > > After the last discussions on uclinux-dev about this I have > a patch virtualy identical to this prepared for inclusion > in the 2.6.26 merge window. So you drop this one. Great. That's why I asked you about a devel tree. The latest uclinux patch is linux-2.6.24-uc0.patch.gz which does not contain such a fix. The latest dist snapshot patch is from 2008-03-05 and is about 147 MiB. I took a look at the diffstat (9.67 KB/s) - `uClinux-dist-20070130-20080305.diffstat' saved and yes, there are some modifications to fec.c but 10KiB/sec take me forever. I stared leeching it. The CVS [1] has no linux-2.6 directory. Therefore I assumed that is the latest one. I've been browsing the mailing list archive and did not find anything close to it (I found multicast discussions for instance). Could please Cc me in future on your m68k patches? I would setup a git tree and feed them there. Alternatively I would be pleased if you could give me a pointer to your quilt series since I'm obviously not clever enough to find it. [1] http://cvs.uclinux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/uClinux-dist/ > Regards > Greg Sebastian _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
