Gavin Lambert wrote: > > Is it a real problem to use (e.g.) bash in busybox ? > > Bash requires an MMU, last time I checked (because it requires full glibc, > which requires an MMU). And again it's unrelated to busybox.
I'm pretty sure Bash works with uClibc just fine - I've used it on an x86 uClibc build. However, Bash is large and slow and not recommended for a small device, especially with no MMU. But it should work, if you don't mind that. Busybox comes with several shell choices, not just msh. I use msh because it's the smallest, but it does have a few bugs and many limitations. -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
