Hi Alex,

Alex Eremeenkov wrote:
Thanks a lot. Problem were with cache flushing, how you say. But i have one more question. It is able to add support of split D-cache&I-cache by enbling it in mcfcache.h and writing additional functions for flushing each cache region (add support for functions __flush_icache_all and __flush_dcache_all)? Or for enable D-cache it need some serious patch to kernel?

Its possible to do. It has been on my todo list for a while.
A long time back it broke things like te FEC ethernet driver
(which needs proper fixing).

Regards
Greg



2008/10/5 Greg Ungerer <g...@snapgear.com <mailto:g...@snapgear.com>>

    Hi Alexander,


    Alexander Eremeenkov wrote:

        I have performance problems with applications on this
        kernel(uClinux 2.6.25-uc0).
        First of all, I have custom made board with this features:
        ColdFire 5274 @ 150 MHz
        External Bus Frequency 75 MHz

        uClinux 2.6.25 boot up and work perfectly stable, but very slow.
        For this board i have also 2.4.x kernel compiled, and it works
        more faster ( ~ 2-20 times faster, if different test application).
        After reading maillist, i find, that some people have equals
        problems, and their reason were - disabled cache. But in my
        case, cache enabled in start process normally.
        Calibration delay calculate good value:
        Calibrating delay loop... 98.71 BogoMIPS (lpj=493568)

        Also, if i disabled cache in /include/asm-m68knommu/mcfcache.h,
        i got looks-like normal, with disabled cache, value:
        Calibrating delay loop... 5.82 BogoMIPS
        So, I have drawn a conclusion, that cache enables good.

        Now, about performance. I test it with some applications.
        1. Dhrystone test. With it, i have 4065 dhrystones/second, that
        critically small for this CPU. But i curious, that, when a
        disabled cache, the result same.. As though like cache at just
        flushed or worked incorrect.
        2. Simple forever cycle with 1 value in memory incremented. This
        test, also show near ~5 real MISP performance.
        When i try to watch assess to external memory by CPU, i saw,
        that, it work with external RAM(where this application contain)
        everytime - but i think that, simple application with 5 command
        + 1 value memory must being in cache, and CPU must work with
        cache only.
        3. Some real/work application. They do massive processing/moving
        data, working with peripheral, etc. I also have quite bad
        performance. Those applications runs at 2.4.x kernel at ~4 times
        faster.

        So, conclusion with it.
        1) I think, that i can't have problems with hardware - because,
        2.4.x kernel work fast.
        2) I have enabled cache at start process - 98 BogoMIPS good
        value for my CPU, also 2.4 kernel calculate same result.

        Now i have question, maybe somebody have same problems at this
        kernel?
        Maybe 2.6.xx  so slow, and ways to speed up it use old kernel or
        modern/faster CPU?Maybe some bugs in poring it to ColdFire
        family?Etc?


    There is no reason that application code performance (independant of
    use of kernel system calls) should give noticably different results
    on a 2.6 kernel vs a 2.4 kernel.



        Maybe it problem with cache at working process? Some drivers,
        for example, can flush cache..anyone have equal problem? About
        it, i will check it with kernel build for 5275EVB, but i think,
        that  result will be same, because, a removed all i can
        drivers/modules form kernel, that almost "empty" kernel starts,
        and after it i run Dhrystone test, and get same result.
        Maybe it's a toolchain problem? I use
        m68k-uclinux-tools-20061214.sh, they have some minor problems,
        maybe reason with they? But, my second test with simple
        application excludes this variant.

        If someone had those problems I will be glad for any help.


    I recall a problem a little while back where the cache flush code
    was changing the cache configuration and not just flushing. (I think
    it was the 5282 cache support code that was broken). In this scenario
    the initial cache setup was good (so everything was fast), and after
    the first cache flush the setup was wrong. Now that would make something
    like the bogomips calculation look good, but later performance bad

    Looking at the 2 places this is done:

     linux-2.6.x/include/asm-m68knommu/mcfcache.h
     linux-2.6.x/include/asm-m68knommu/cacheflush.h

    I suspect this may have broken the cache support for the 527x
    series (so the 5270/5271 and 5274/5275).

    To verify if this is what you are seeing, can you change the cache
    flush code for CONFIG_M527x in cacheflush.h from:

       "movel  #0x81000200, %%d0\n\t"

    to

       "movel  #0x81400100, %%d0\n\t"

    This is just to prove this is the problem. A real fix would
    need the 528x and 527x cache flushing code separated out.

    Regards
    Greg




        And my kernel messages at result:

/> cat /proc/kmsg <5>Linux version 2.6.25-uc0 (wa...@arch) (gcc version 4.1.1) #36
        Mon Jan 5 13:05:16 PST 9
<6> <4> <4>uClinux/COLDFIRE(m5274/5275) <6>COLDFIRE port done by Greg Ungerer, g...@snapgear.com
        <mailto:g...@snapgear.com>                               <6>Flat
model support (C) 1998,1999 Kenneth Albanowski, D. Jeff Dionne <7>On node 0 totalpages: 8192 <7> DMA zone: 0 pages used
        for memmap                                                 <7>
Normal zone: 64 pages used for memmap <7> Normal zone: 8128 pages, LIFO batch:0 <7> Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap <4>Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 8128 <5>Kernel command line: <6>Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2,
        16384 bytes)                       <6>Inode-cache hash table
entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) <6>Memory available: 29264k/32768k RAM, (1504k kernel code, 243k
        data)                 <7>Calibrating delay loop... 98.71
BogoMIPS (lpj=493568) <4>Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 <6>net_namespace: 144 bytes <6>NET: Registered protocol family 16 <6>NET: Registered protocol family 2 <6>IP route cache hash table entries:
        1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)                      <6>TCP
established hash table entries: 1024 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) <6>TCP bind hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0,
        4096 bytes)                            <6>TCP: Hash tables
configured (established 1024 bind 1024) <6>TCP reno registered <6>Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 o...@monad.swb.de <mailto:o...@monad.swb.de>). <6>JFFS2 version 2.2. (NAND) ?? 2001-2006 Red
        Hat, Inc.                                <6>io scheduler noop
registered <6>io scheduler cfq registered (default) <4>ColdFire internal UART serial driver <6>ttyS0 at MMIO 0x40000200 (irq = 77) is a ColdFire UART <6>console [ttyS0] enabled <6>ttyS1 at MMIO 0x40000240 (irq = 78) is a ColdFire UART <6>ttyS2 at MMIO 0x40000280 (irq = 79) is a
        ColdFire UART                              <6>brd: module loaded
<4>FEC ENET Version 0.2 <4>fec: PHY @ 0x1, ID 0x20005c90 --
        DP83848                                            <4>eth0:
ethernet 00:04:24:23:34:44 <4>uclinux[mtd]: RAM probe address=0x1d50f4
        size=0x14d000                              <5>Creating 1 MTD
partitions on "RAM": <5>0x00000000-0x0014d000 : "ROMfs" <4>uclinux[mtd]: set ROMfs to be root filesystem <6>Physically mapped flash: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in
        16-bit bank                  <4> Intel/Sharp Extended Query
        Table at 0x010A                                         <4>
Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A <4> Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A
                                                <4> Intel/Sharp Extended
Query Table at 0x010A <4> Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A <6>Using buffer write method <6>Using auto-unlock on power-up/resume <5>cfi_cmdset_0001: Erase suspend on write enabled <7>erase region 0: offset=0x0,size=0x8000,blocks=4 <7>erase region 1: offset=0x20000,size=0x20000,blocks=63 <6>TCP cubic registered <6>NET: Registered protocol family
        1                                                   <6>RPC:
Registered udp transport module. <6>RPC: Registered tcp transport module. <6>NET: Registered protocol family 33 <4>VFS: Mounted root (romfs filesystem) readonly. <5>Freeing unused kernel memory: 52k
        freed (0x1a7000 - 0x1b3000)                       <4>eth0:
config: auto-negotiation on, 100FDX, 100HDX, 10FDX, 10HDX.

-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: g...@snapgear.com <mailto:g...@snapgear.com>
    SnapGear, a McAfee Company                  PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
    825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
    Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
    _______________________________________________
    uClinux-dev mailing list
    uClinux-dev@uclinux.org <mailto:uClinux-dev@uclinux.org>
    http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
    This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
    <mailto:uclinux-dev@uclinux.org>
    To unsubscribe see:
    http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     g...@snapgear.com
SnapGear, a McAfee Company                  PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to