On 2009-03-17, Michael Schnell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's fine if the code is simple enough to be event driven
>> and always returns to your event scheduler.
That was written by Jamie Lokier
> Sorry but I can't follow you. You just said in the mail I
> replied to:
>
>>> " I know. That's how my threaded app works."
That wansn't written my Mr. Lokier, it was written by me.
[That's why people leave in attributions when quoting
articles.]
What _I_ meant was that when one of my threads gets scheduled,
it runs until it has finished what it needs to do and blocks
waiting for the next event. Isn't that's what "run to
completion" means?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Someone in DAYTON,
at Ohio is selling USED
visi.com CARPETS to a SERBO-CROATIAN
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
