First combination is tiny
but sash has problems with conditions and starting applications in
background.
sash in fact can't do conditions but AFAIK there is no problem with
starting applications in background by "appname &"
Busybox is nice but fat. It becomes noticeable when several
copies are loaded into memory: init, getty and shell.
if your arch does not support XIP, busybox in fact is loaded multiple
times. this might be a problem. That is why in my projects, I don't use
msh from busybox as default shell.
You could use sash as default shell and msh from busybox when
appropriate. See http://www.nioswiki.com/Initialization_Script
-Michael
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
