Greg, Quick question. If I want to apply the newest stable patch-set to the base 888 kernel tree, should I only stick with the patch set that is on Sourceforge, or are the ones on the uClinux.org site just as stable(i.e. the one you just uploaded)? I've noticed that the Sourceforge site does not have the last few patch-sets and I'm just wondering if there is a reason for that (or is it just that no one has gotten around to uploading the new patches to Sourceforge?).
-JB On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Greg Ungerer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have started an upload of a new uClinux-dist patch, at: > > http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/patches/uClinux-dist-20080808-20090520.patch.gz > > It won't all be there for probably about 24 hours. So hold of > downloading 'till tomorrow :-) > > It includes a linux-2.6.29 kernel, and other various fixes and > source updates - nothing major. I think most targets work as well > as the did with the 2.6.26 kernel in there. (Excepting ARMulator > I think, I haven't had time to look at it yet). > > As usual please post any patches and fixes here. (I may be a > little slow in responding for the next couple of weeks, I'll be > away). > > I haven't released a linux-2.6.29-uc0 patch set as I normally would. > Instead I have been pushing my changes into the git tree at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gerg/m68knommu.git > > And then promoting them from there. Means less work for me :-) > But, are people attached to using the -uc patch series? > Does anyone still want me to create them? > > So far in that git tree in the "for-linus" branch is a set of > changes to clean up the various ColdFire reset/reboot code, it should > work much better on all platforms now. > > There is some more merged include file cleanups in the "includes" > branch. > > The biggest changes in that git tree and some interrupt controller > improvements I am working on. There is now specific support code > for each of the various types of interrupt controllers used in > the various ColdFire parts. The support for the new parts with the > larger more flexible interrupt controllers is clean and nice (so > for 5208, 5235, 5271/5275, 5282, 5329 and their type). The code > for the older parts (5206, 5249, 5307, 5407, etc) is better, but > I am still working to improve it a little more. > > Regards > Greg > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: [email protected] > SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 > 825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630 > Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by [email protected] > To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev > _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
