> > No. Byte would be addqb. I think you're right, I am not familiar coldfire assembly and instruction. I just touched it no long time.
addqb instruction is not supported on coldfire platform. Which better way to replace it? I tried to use addql, but it proves that it's incorrect. I guess my patch could be better way to replace it now. Regards, Lanttor ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> *Sent:* 07/02/2009 5:05:59 PM +0800 *To:* Lanttor <[email protected]> *CC:* [email protected], uClinux development list <[email protected]> *Subject:* Interrupt issue on m68k platform and some fix > Lanttor <[email protected]> writes: > > >> So this code sets value 1 to the second byte of preempt_count field. >> > > No. Byte would be addqb. > > Andreas. > > _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
