>uClinux-dist supports anything (MMU and !MMU).
>
>The kernel in the latest uClinux-dist's is as close to the kernel.org
>eleases as possible.
>
>uClinux-dist even lets you add your own kernel easily. For example,
>take the "penguinppc" kernel, extract it to a directory at in the dists top
>level dir called something like linux-2.6.ppc, and do a "make config", it
>will let you chose the new kernel for building.
>
So what is the purpose of the Snapgear project at this point? I've always
thought of Snapgear as basically being uClinux extended to MMU-ful processors,
but if the regular uClinux distribution now supports that, what's special about
Snapgear?
I've never tried to use the raw uClinux-dist by itself, so please excuse me if
there's a fairly obvious answer to this question. If I used uClinux-dist by
itself, would I be responsible for providing a toolchain and compatible
uClibc/glibc? If this is the case, I can seen an advantage in Snapgear, since
it provides all of this.
--Dave
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
