Hi All,

I am experimenting with one of our uClinux-based no-mmu systems and low 
memory situations. I found several articles about OOM (on linux-mm.org 
and LWN), read man 5 proc (from kernel.org to have the latest) and 
grepped and read through at least part of the Documentation folder in 
the kernel. But I must be missing something and would appreciate a 
pointer to what else to read under Documentation or in a white paper /
web page / mailing list thread that explains the following to me:

I created a test that would do n mallocs of size m, figured that size 
4096 allocs already need two pages via proc/pid/maps but 4092 size 
allocs just use one page, then did cat /proc/zoneinfo and had my little 
app just allocate all the free pages in zone Normal.

Also I had set /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory to 2 and overcommit_ratio
to 100. And in my /init script echoed -17 to proc/pid/oom_adj of all
running processes. The idea was that I expected to kernel to start 
failing the mallocs on my usermode code.

To my surprise the kernel just panicked:
/ # memuser -t 0 4092 4900
[  113.910000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Out of memory and no killable 
processes...
[  113.910000] 

I am still a newbie and this must be and age-old topic so I must be
missing some old and very basic discussions that possibly predate linux
about why a kernel just dies like this. 

Or I have just overlooked some part of the documentation that would
allow me to control at which point user mode allocs should start to fail
and return NULL and that is why it panics now (but lowmem_reserve_ratio
and min_free_kbytes and not documented on
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man5/proc.5.html
?anymore?).

I can see that disabling the OOM killer means taking away the preferred
way for the kernel to deal with an OOM situation, and I saw a patch
mentioned that does bookkeeping of memory for process groups which might
help, but before I start searching for and applying patches I wanted to
ask here.

RTFM type comments (mentioning a useful M) are highly appreciated!

Best Regards,
- Rainer

_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to