The 2009-q3 version that someone else mentioned ... ------------------ -----Original Message----- From: <ucli...@browserseal.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:12:09 To: uClinux development list<uclinux-dev@uclinux.org> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
On 11/17/2009, "phil...@googlemail.com" <phil...@googlemail.com> wrote: >CodeSourcery-lite for uClinux is a good choice, > Maybe, except that it does not work :) What is the exact version you are using ? >Cheers, phil > >------------------ > >-----Original Message----- >From: <ucli...@browserseal.com> >Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:00 >To: uClinux development list<uclinux-dev@uclinux.org> >Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support > >On 11/17/2009, "Jeff Bacon" <jbac.uc....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>ucli...@browserseal.com wrote: >>> I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the >>> multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this >>> architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question - >>> what happened to ARM support and uClinux in general ? Last time I >>> checked, i.e. about two years ago, it was probably the most popular >>> embedded distro, at least for ARM - and now it does not even compile ! >>> >>> I will send a separate email with compilation errors, I just think that >>> it would be better to have a separate thread for this general >>> discussion. Provided there is anybody out there interested in discussing >>> ARM, which I seriously doubt. >>>_______________________________________________ >>> uClinux-dev mailing list >>> uClinux-dev@uclinux.org >>> http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev >>> This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org >>> To unsubscribe see: >>> http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev >>> >>> >>uhh...I'm pretty sure a significant portion of this mailing list uses >>ARM platforms for uClinux. I currently have the latest uClinux 2.6 dist >>running on an arm7tdmi, and plenty of people on this list have it >>running on other ARM platforms...maybe your follow-up messages will help >>clear things up, but if you search the mailing list you'll see plenty of >>ARM-related discussions. > >This is encouraging. In that case - a few general questions. What cross >compiler toolchain are you using ? Do you use any simulator, and if yes >- which one ? What is the recommended, i.e. cheapest, ARM based >development board for uClinux ? I checked BeagleBoard, but it only runs >OpenEmbedded which actually ate all of my free disk space during >compilation process - 20GB! > >>_______________________________________________ >>uClinux-dev mailing list >>uClinux-dev@uclinux.org >>http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev >>This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org >>To unsubscribe see: >>http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev >_______________________________________________ >uClinux-dev mailing list >uClinux-dev@uclinux.org >http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev >This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org >To unsubscribe see: >http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev > _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
