Philippe De Muyter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Jeff Bacon wrote: > > > On 4/21/2010 11:04 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > What version of Busybox are you using? I am finding it difficult to make > > > a newer version (1.15.x, 1.16.0) that small. In fact, when I configure > > > it with a single applet, I still somehow get a ~200kB binary. Are there > > > other options you are using in the build process to make your BB binary > > > so small? > > > > You don't have to have just one busybox binary containing everything. > > Ideally, one should have only one XIP (thus shared) busybox with zero-sized > data and bss segments (rodata is allowed but moved into text segment). > > Then each new process needs only to allocate a stack + heap if needed.
To do that, you'll have to rewrite busybox _and_ uClibc to not use any data and bss... -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
