Actually, I just looked at the newest uClibc, and it seems to have the same
limitation (no support for named semaphores or system level semaphores that can
be used between processes).
So back to my original question: does anyone know of any reason that the glibc
implementations of sem_open, sem_wait, and sem_post couldn't be dropped into my
uClibc build as a patch? It seems like they'd be pretty self-contained.
Alternately, I guess I could use SysV semaphores, but they seem unnecessarily
complicated for simple binary locking.
--Dave
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
