Hi Greg,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:00, Greg Ungerer <g...@snapgear.com> wrote:
> On 24/03/11 08:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:43,<g...@snapgear.com> wrote:
>>> slso on the for-next branch in that tree, so will get some testing
>>> in the next tree for the next few days.
>>
>> defconfig is now a nommu-config, and it fails?
>>
>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4012794/
>
> Yep, that looks wrong. I'll move the define for KBUILD_DEFCONFIG
> into arch/m68k/Makefile (and remove the existing defines in Makefile_mm
> and Makefile_no). That will make the DEFCONFIG as it was before,
> multi_defconfig.
>
>> arch/m68k/kernel/entry_no.S:47: Error: Unknown operator -- statement
>> `save_all' ignored
>
> This is due to compiling for the non-mmu targets and not using
> a m68k-uclinux- toolchain. Unfortunately the compiler must define
> __uClinux__ to compile for non-mmu targets. This isn't new, we
For userland...
> have had this problem ever since the merge of the header files.
> (The exported headers need some switch to use to base some
> conditionals on, and kernel config options cannot be used in
> exported headers).
For kernels, we can explicitly define this in arch/m68k/Makefile if !MMU, right?
> But with a fixed defconfig, you won't see this anymore :-)
>
> I'll fix up the git commit on m68knommu git tree.
Good, thx!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
