Hi Gavin,
On 26/05/11 17:28, Gavin Lambert wrote:
Quoth Greg Ungerer:
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven<ge...@linux-m68k.org> writes:
What exactly do you mean by "does not support anything less"? It
seems it does restrict instruction generation to 68000 if you
ask for it.
The point is that Linux/m68k requires 68020+, so compiling for 68000
does not make sense (at least back when the gcc configuration was
created).
Yeah, used to be true :-)
This seems very much to me to be a "broken compiler" issue.
Hmm, that has me worried a little. I was thinking about trying to use gcc
for a (non-Linux) M68000 device.
Does the above mean that this would be problematic?
It seems to have been fixed in newer versions of gcc.
My current 4.5.1 generates only the defines I would expect
based on the supplied machine type options.
Regards
Greg
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
