On Wednesday 06 June 2012 8:26:14 pm Greg Ungerer wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On 06/06/12 01:23, Steven King wrote: > > Basic support for the Coldfire 5251/5253. > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven king<sfk...@fdwdc.com> > > --- > > arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu | 8 ++ > > arch/m68k/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/m68k/include/asm/dma.h | 4 +- > > arch/m68k/include/asm/m525xsim.h | 196 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfgpio.h | > > 8 +- > > arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfsim.h | 3 + > > arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfuart.h | 4 +- > > arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/head.S | 6 +- > > arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/intc-525x.c | 91 ++++++++++++++ > > arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/m525x.c | 66 +++++++++++ > > 11 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > I have pushed this onto the for-next branch of the m68knommu git tree. > > We definitely need to work on merging the m5249sim.h and m525xsim.h, > they have way to much in common.
Yes, I agree. My current thinking is that once I have my target features for the '53 working (alsa SoC audio, maybe the ata and maybe the usb), go back and figure out what bits dont apply to the '49. A lot should be the same, but you know how Freescale is, they like to make slight variations of the same IP block. _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev