On Wednesday 06 June 2012 8:26:14 pm Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 06/06/12 01:23, Steven King wrote:
> > Basic support for the Coldfire 5251/5253.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven king<sfk...@fdwdc.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu                   |    8 ++
> >   arch/m68k/Makefile                      |    1 +
> >   arch/m68k/include/asm/dma.h             |    4 +-
> >   arch/m68k/include/asm/m525xsim.h        |  196
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfgpio.h         |
> >    8 +-
> >   arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfsim.h          |    3 +
> >   arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfuart.h         |    4 +-
> >   arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/Makefile    |    1 +
> >   arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/head.S      |    6 +-
> >   arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/intc-525x.c |   91 ++++++++++++++
> >   arch/m68k/platform/coldfire/m525x.c     |   66 +++++++++++
> >   11 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> I have pushed this onto the for-next branch of the m68knommu git tree.
>
> We definitely need to work on merging the m5249sim.h and m525xsim.h,
> they have way to much in common.

Yes, I agree.  My current thinking is that once I have my target features for 
the '53 working (alsa SoC audio, maybe the ata and maybe the usb), go back 
and figure out what bits dont apply to the '49.  A lot should be the same, 
but you know how Freescale is, they like to make slight variations of the 
same IP block.
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to