On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Philippe De Muyter <p...@macqel.be> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> On 08/06/12 23:35, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> I mentionned that only to make you able to soften the commit comment :)
>>
>> Ok, makes sense. I should probably have mentioned that this means
>> the ColdFire processors currently support by Linux :-)
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> All of the current Linux supported ColdFire CPUs handle unaligned
>> memory accesses. So remove the CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED option
>> selection for ColdFire. If we ever support a specific ColdFire CPU
>> that does not support unaligned accesses then we can insert the
>> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED for that specific CPU type.
>
> That's perfect. The line about dumb copying of the m68knommu settings
> was too much self-flagellation for you to my eyes :)
So I rewrote history on my for-3.6 branch...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
