On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Luis Alves <lja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway... Digging in the kernel sources and reading some stuff, I
> concluded that "Sleep inside atomic section checking" doesn't make
> sense since the m68k arch doesn't support SMP or preemption.
> From what I could understand this check looks for scheduling inside
> spinlocks (that should disable preemption).
> In my case, since I don't have preemption enabled in the first place,
> then spinlocks do absolutely nothing (the ones that don't disable
> irqs).
Isn't this message also printed while scheduling with interrupts disabled?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
