On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:43PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 05:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:40:03PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > This breakage is telling us something about the weird approach taken in > > > this file, methinks. > > > > > Yes, they have persistent problems with renamed or moved drivers. I somewhat > > understood the need for SPI chips, but even there it seemed to me there > > should > > be a better solution. > > The output of the (local) scripts I use mention about a dozen more > (possible) problems in both Blackfin's stamp.c files. I'm roughly > working my way back in git history, slowly, so those problems are > probably older. > > Since I know from previous cleaning up efforts that the Blackfin people > know they have non-working code (eg, code not actually buildable since > it has no working Kconfig support) I do not give Blackfin much priority. > But this patch (and the other two related to the v3.2 release) were > obvious oversights that I could as well fix right away. > Makes me shiver ...
Guenter _______________________________________________ Uclinux-dist-devel mailing list Uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dist-devel
