On 05/28/2013 08:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Right, that is what the patch I just posted does.
>
> On a related note, I found that WARN_ON() can no longer be compiled
> out since there is already code that relies on the side-effects of
> the condition. I assume that was an intentional change I missed,
> since it used to be defined so that you could remove it completely.
>
It is possible to define WARN_ON() as:
#define WARN_ON(x) ((void)(x))
... which preserves side effects.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Uclinux-dist-devel mailing list
Uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dist-devel
