Hello,
indeed I had two different version. Probably not a gt patch, anyway:
The manifests:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Sealed: true
Implementation-Version: 1.1.2_01
Specification-Title: Java Advanced Imaging
Specification-Version: 1.1-mr
Implementation-Title: javax.media.jai
Extension-Name: javax.media.jai
Created-By: 1.3.1_03 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
and
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.2
Created-By: 1.4.2_12-b03 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Specification-Title: Java Advanced Imaging
Specification-Version: 1.1-mr
Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Implementation-Title: javax.media.jai
Implementation-Version: 1.1.3
Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Extension-Name: javax.media.jai
Sealed: true
Ugo
Ugo Taddei wrote:
Andrea Aime wrote:
Stefan Krüger ha scritto:
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:16:01 Ugo Taddei wrote:
I'd find it better to have this patched jai have a name different
than it's original (something like jai_core_gt_patch.jar). In a
system with a multitude of jars, it's ever so easy so overlook one.
+1
Patched JAI? Patched how and by whom?
I might have to take it back. In fact, reading the jai api I do see the
method there (JAI.createTileCache()). So it's either osgi getting on my
way again (not the first time this week) or my not paying attention.
(I'd try to reproduce the state eclipse it was in when I found this, but
I have just spent hours trying to make it work. So I ain't touching it
again.)
First time I hear about this.
Cheers
Andrea
Sorry Andreas, might be I'm mistaking it with image-ext?
Cheers,
Ugo
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
