On 17/04/2010, at 5:05 PM, andrea antonello wrote: >> I would think that recognising organisations as part of the running >> application (and online help) is of more interest? Indeed this is where I >> want to recognise contributing organisations - where users can see the >> contribution. > > Jody, that is the point of the discussion and you seem to not consider > what we are saying.
I did consider and understand that; indeed this conversation has come up a couple of times. Personally I do not mind what we are doing just so long as we have a reason and are consistent. The last thing I want to do is annoy people; but I also do not want the codebase to be a tangle. Please don't miss understand me; with respect to "net.refractions.udig" this represents where the project is held; and even when we move the codebase it it is likely to remain that way for api stability. I expect we will will move to GIT in may with the repo Jesse is running, Refractions no longer has a member on the steering committee and I do not work for them. Jody _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
