Hi Emily, > Andrea - Thanks for the feedback. My comments are in-line.
[...] > I have found and fixed this problem. Great! [...] >> To summarize: >> - there would be the need to apply a colortable straight, with its >> contained values (case 1 and partially case 2) > > What do you think of me adding these predefined colortables to the Color > Palette drop down list? (see attached image). That would be indeed cool. So, in case you select those palettes, they would be set with coded values, right? >> - case two could be better solved with the "quantile function" as >> classification function, as already used in the vector styler > > Yes I wanted to add this but I can't reuse the vector styler quantile > function as it works on features (not doubles) and I didn't have the time to > re-implement it for rasters. I will try to get this incorporated. ok, I didn't check on the feature quantile. >> I am not sure if this is something you have time/interest to work on >> and I am not asking that, you already did a great job here. You asked >> for comments and here they came :) I only would like to leave the old >> styler active (maybe with the name changed to "legacy" or something >> that would use it a second choice) until we do not have such >> functionalities, that is all. >> >> About renaming: >> - feel free to change the name of the old styler to "Legacy Single >> Banded Raster Styler" > > > If I incorporate the above two points do we still need to keep this? Nope, if you incorporate the above, my single band styler can be send happily to retirement. >> - what about changing also the name of the "Simple Raster" editor? >> Apart of the fact that I never used it in my life, but it looks like >> something that would work only for imagery. Could we switch it off for >> single band rasters and enable it only in the multi case? And maybe >> change the name to "Imagery"? > > The name change sounds good. I was also interested in only having it > available for 3+ band rasters but I could not figure out how to do this? Do > you have any ideas? To be honest I do not. I assume the extention point would have to be changed? But I am not sure it is worth the hassle? One more question, did you wish to have this feature in the 1.4 release? Thanks, Andrea _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
