Hi Frank, I am a bit stuck in the usual back from abroad mess, but if you organize an IRC Meeting to push on these, I will be part of it and finally solve the problems.
Obviously if there are still LGPLs on my code, then it is a missing, I intended to change them all to the right license. So if they pass your way, feel free to change them. Cheers, Andrea On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Frank Gasdorf <fg...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Updated the spreadsheet > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtOHw31i-Ij_dDVfOHVWQV9lXzVjaFNwR2xpcWF6cHc#gid=0: > > * added new status "needs review" and added "blue" formating for this value > --> see comments in the last column > > Progress: > * changed several LGPL references to EPL + BSD > * added/ updated copyright informations for Extension point definitions > (exsd) > * updated copyrightText for Project.genmodel > * updated License.txt files > * removed several historical txt-files > * removed hfb-v10.txt (no references in sources, maybe in 3rd-party libs > like geotools --> can we go ahead and remove SOSNOKILLINGLICENSE.txt as > well?) > > Question: > * How do we handle *-screen files (created with WireframeSketchers). These > are ecore-model files but are not required at runtime. We used it to > document RFC's initial UI ideas. Remove these? > * Andrea, when can we start to update eu.udig.tools java source headers > (LGPL)? I could help if required! > > How can we synchronize our tasks (see status "in progress" of the > spreadsheet). Who will communicate with Eclipse IP team (tasks with "needs > review" status) and when will we provide the next initial contribution? > > I'd like to suggest a weekly IRC session kind of stand-up of the IP > progress. Any suggestions for the timetable? > > Cheers > > - Frank > > > > 2013/5/23 Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> >> It is not a requirement, I will just explain it is a freely available tool >> (license required to unlock more functionality ). >> >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> On 20/05/2013, at 10:43 PM, Frank Gasdorf <fg...@users.sourceforge.net> >> wrote: >> >> > Got back second round of feedback, this time very detailed. > > Looks >> > like we have: > - a number of files still marked LGPL (mostly >> > eu.udig.tools) >> > > - and a few section with with GPL in the header (JGrass mostly), and >> > SLDValidator we will have to remove (or get pushed into GeoTools) > - a few >> > mentions of swear words in the comments to clean up! > - all my wireframe >> > sketcher diagrams >> >> To bad, i like wireframe sketchers and I don't know why its required to >> remove these. Well, a license is required but so what?! >> >> > I will try and put the document up in google docs for PSC members to >> > look at, and make a plan of attack. >> >> Done. Link has been sent. Some rows are already done, mostly lgpl stuff >> from last 8 or 10 commits on locationtech_ip branch. Going to add pmc's >> tomorrow and Update the current Status as well. >> >> > All in all much better then our first attempt, thanks for the hard work >> > on dependencies Frank. > > --> Jody Garnett >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> http://udig.refractions.net >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
