In the case I am considered an "author" for having contribute during GSoC
2012 to porting Axios Tools un uDig Core, I have no problem in changing the
license of files bearing my name.
In the case you are replying me: "so.. ..please do the change yourself!" do
not forget to also add some hints on how to perform the task. ;-)
I have no idea on how to contribute to new LocationTech repositories.
Actually even where are they and whether am I allowed to edit them.

Marco


2013/6/4 andrea antonello <andrea.antone...@gmail.com>

> As announced, we had a short IRC in the uDig channel about the tasks
> that need to be done to support the locationtech migration and bring
> uDig and its sources in a buildable and deliverable state again.
>
>
> LICENSE CLEANUP - IP PROCESS
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> For those who do not know, the IP process has identified some issues
> with wrong licensing on some code parts. The spreadsheet that
> summarizes leftover problems, is located here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtOHw31i-Ij_dDVfOHVWQV9lXzVjaFNwR2xpcWF6cHc#gid=0
>
> WHO SHOULS LOOK:
> - everyone that contributed code and is not sure about the license he chose
> - companies that contributed code or people that are able to give
> information about how to contact them. One example is Axios.
> Frank supplied a possible solution, obviously we need an agreement
> form the authors:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.udig.devel/21040
>
>
> WHERE TO PUSH CHANGES
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> During the IRC the following workflow came up, to balance the need of
> migration and the need to have a releasable and updated uDig at any
> time.
>
> 1) bugfixes and patches: are committed to the current *master* branch.
> That one builds and we can then merge it later when we are in the eclipse
> repo.
>
> 2) non-breaking fixes (like headers): are committed to the current
> *master* branch and then they are also merged into the
> *locationtech_ip* branch.
>
> 3) breaking locationtech_ip changes: are committed to the
> *locationtech_ip* branch only.
> One example of changes of this kind is the removal of libraries, as it
> happened already, and which is also the reason the locationtech_ip
> branch does not build.
>
> for those who do not know, this is the locationtech_ip branch:
> https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/tree/locationtech_ip
>
>
> NEXT IRC MEETING
> ------------------------------
>
> We are now taking a week time to solve all the possible license issues
> and will meet again on Tuesday the 11th at the same time.
> Time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=IRC+to+organize+Eclipse+IP+Tasks+for+uDIG+contributions&iso=20130611T12&p1=307&ah=1
>
>
> FEELING LOST?
> -------------------------
>
> You are lost and not sure if you should stand up and act? Simply drop
> us an email and we can help you out.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrea & Frank
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to