Re, Le mercredi 26 septembre 2007 à 17:08 +0200, Daniel Maher a écrit : > On Wed, 2007-26-09 at 15:01 +0200, Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > In the syntax to call VPI.VCI, no interface number assume interface 0, so > > 0.VPI.VCI. Using 1.VPI.VCI should work for the second atm interface. > > > > Number come from the content of /proc/net/atm/devices file. > > For the second modem, you should use 1.VPI.VCI. > > In that same file are should be indicated the MAC of each modem. > > Thank you for the clarification; i can now create nas# interfaces, which > are to be linked to each device separately. As a result, i am now able > to define the devices separately for the purposes of connecting with > PPPoE. > > Also, based on your suggestion, it has now become obvious that the same > technique can be applied to the PPPoA configuration as well, by > specifying the ATM device in the pppoatm.so definition.
Fine that you found it on your own. I've found old links that I had written at the time of eagle-usb : http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=MultiLink http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=MultiVCI (well, in French but I infer that it will not be a problem for you) Maybe it can help too, though a bit outdated and does not apply exactly to ueagle-atm. Feel free to update it and share your solution in the end. > Merci encore! De nada, you're welcome. Do not hesitate to subscribe to the mailing-list as you're not already (see https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ueagleatm-dev to subscribe). It has become low volume now that the ueagle-atm driver is doing its way in the vanilla kernel. @++ Ben'. aka baud123 _______________________________________________ Ueagleatm-dev mailing list Ueagleatm-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ueagleatm-dev
