X-Mail-List: ufdbGuard
will that have a performance hit if I have multiple IP blocks and use
expressions on them, comparing to one IP per line in the alwaysdeny/domains
file?
for example if I have 5000 IPs from those netmask-ed ranges, I will need
5000 lines in alwaysdeny/domains and probably 50 lines in
alwaysdeny/expressions, which one will be better then?
Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:18 AM Marcus Kool <[email protected]>
wrote:
> X-Mail-List: ufdbGuard
> ufdbGuard has no configuration option to include a range of IP addresses
> as URLs in a URL table.
>
> However, in your example you can add an expressionlist to alwaysdeny to
> block 10.2.0.0/16.
> The expressions file contains one line:
> ^10\.2\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+(/|$|:)
>
> Marcus
>
>
> On 24/07/18 13:05, Gordon Hsiao wrote:
> > X-Mail-List: ufdbGuard
> >
> >
> >
> > I need block a range of IP addresses(e.g. 10.2.0.0/16), so far I had to
> add them to alwaysdeny/domains one IP per line which is very tedious, can
> ufdbguard support ipv4/ipv4list
> > netmask or a iplist file directly, like it does for the "source" section?
> >
> > Gordon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> ufdbGuard-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufdbguard-support
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ufdbGuard-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufdbguard-support
