hello Gurus;
In Sun Info Doc 72063, it clearly says that Solaris 9 SVM metadbs are
8192 blocks in size while earlier version of SDS have metadb which are
1034 blocks in size.
I am guessing the incorrect terminology was used?
It should be 8192 sectors and 1034 sectors instead of 8192 blocks and
1034 blocks?
ufs blocks are default 8K in size. A 8192 block size would = 8k * 8192 =
64 Mbyte!!
The above cannot be because Sun formal recommendation for the metadb
slice is only 32 Mbytes! (256 Mbytes is now defunct)
But metadb reside on non ufs slices so I am guesing the block size refer
to sector sizes (512 bytes).
Thus one metadb would be 8192 * 512 bytes = 4k?
Warmest Regards
Steven Sim
Fujitsu Asia Pte. Ltd.
_____________________________________________________
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate
to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.
_______________________________________________
ufs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
