Frank Batschulat wrote > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:32 +0100, Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ufs > > magic 11954 format dynamic time Wed Feb 21 14:28:15 2007 > > sblkno 16 cblkno 24 iblkno 32 dblkno 760 > > sbsize 2048 cgsize 8192 cgoffset 64 cgmask 0xffffffc0 > > ncg 93 size 4530330 blocks 4461120 > > bsize 8192 shift 13 mask 0xffffe000 > > fsize 1024 shift 10 mask 0xfffffc00 > > frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 1 > > minfree 1% maxbpg 2048 optim time > > maxcontig 7 rotdelay 0ms rps 60 > > csaddr 760 cssize 2048 shift 9 mask 0xfffffe00 > > ntrak 48 nsect 128 spc 6144 ncyl 1475 > > cpg 16 bpg 6144 fpg 49152 ipg 5824 > > nindir 2048 inopb 64 nspf 2 > > nbfree 0 ndir 15704 nifree 381641 nffree 135498 > > cgrotor 52 fmod 0 ronly 0 logbno 1568 > > rolled 2 si 1 flags 0 > > version 2 > > fs_reclaim FS_RECLAIM > > Dateisystem-Status gültig, > > fsclean ist -3 > > Blöcke verfügbar in jeder Drehposition > > so you formerly claimed: > > <snip> > unknon ufs NOTICE: alloc /: file system full > Thats impossile: There must be at least 90 GB free space > <snip end> > > thats not possible since / is about 34.56 GB in size, since > you have fs->fs_size = 4530330 (number of blocks in fs) > * block size of 8k fs->fs_bsize = 8192 makes up a ~ 34.56 GB file system.
Is fs->fs_bsize == 8192 the correct unit for fs->fs_size and fs->fs_blocks ? Isn't it fs->fs_fsize ? I'd say this is a 4.5GB filesystem. Which can easily be filled with a full Solaris Developer Express installation... This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ ufs-discuss mailing list [email protected]
