On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Darren Dunham wrote:
Would the result have to be a modified UFS driver? Especially
given the problems mentioned of the conditionals, how about
separating it out? It wouldn't be as useful, but could there be a
'ufsx86' for SPARC and a 'ufssparc' for x86?
Both could assume the correct byte-swap instead of a conditional.
Uglier than a unified driver, but the functionality would be
appreciated if a unifed one will never be written.
Or keep the code in the ufs driver and add a mount option to do this
(call it "liliput" or whatever)
/dale
_______________________________________________
ufs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
