Difference is obvious......since g++ uses a different set of libraries. -Narendra
On 4/7/06, Binu Jose Philip <binu.j.philip at sun.com> wrote: > > Ananth A <writetoananth at gmail.com> writes: > > >> Yeah C++ compilation is always slower due to overheads. Have you > tried > >> adding extern "C" for you hello world program to force C linkage > and > >> disable the C++ > poly-mangled-virtual-inherited-temporarily-constructed- > >> referential overheads ? I dunno whether this will help though. :-P > > > > not just compiling but execution speed ( as per wall clock) is also > slower. > > > > most of the overheads were disabled using the cmd line options to g++... > > As I understand it, the difference is what you link with unless > you are compiling c++ code. I have this snippet in x.c: > > int > main() > { > int i; > i = 1; > return (0); > } > > $ gcc -c x.c > $ g++ -o xCC -c x.c > $ gcc -o x_c x.c > $ g++ -o x_cc x.c > > ------- at ---- tmp> ls -l x* > -rw-r--r-- 1 ------- staff 46 Apr 7 23:04 x.c > -rw-r--r-- 1 ------- staff 630 Apr 7 23:06 x.o > -rw-r--r-- 1 ------- staff 630 Apr 7 23:06 xCC.o > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ------- staff 6004 Apr 7 23:04 x_c > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ------- staff 6108 Apr 7 23:05 x_cc > > $ diff x.o xCC.o > $ diff x_c x_cc > Binary files x_c and x_cc differ > > Needless to say startup is where the speed difference must be. > > cheers > Binu > _______________________________________________ > ug-bosug mailing list > List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ug-bosug-unsubscribe at opensolaris.org > List-Owner: mailto:ug-bosug-owner at opensolaris.org > List-Archives: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=54 > -- Warm Regards, S.S.Narendra Kumar Visit my blogs at: http://ssnarendrakumar.blogspot.com/ http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/ssnkumar ___ ___ __ _ / __/ / __/ / | / / _\ \ _ \ \ / /| |/ / \___/ \___/ /_/ |__/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ug-bosug/attachments/20060410/8ee780ba/attachment.html>