Personally I still have several questions.
Yesterday mid day Toronto time the ex wife gave a press conference and
through her lawyer stated that FBI had talked to her in the morning for the
first time and she was cooperative, this was the first time she knew that
her ex was the sniper and FBI instructed her not to talk to any one. But the
night before she was interview by Reuters and I saw the interview on wire
before I went to work yesterday, is she lying or FBI is lying?
A man with his son who are so smart to hide away from the massive hunt that
has been going on for weeks, the way they can be found on a high way
sleeping and arrested with out incidence, is still baffling me.
What happened to the white van and since when did it turn into a blue
caprice?
If the whole intent of these two people was to kill as many people as
possible, which they succeeded into doing, why didn't they ask for money on
day one? Why did they ask for it when they had almost 10 people and why no
body is talking about it now and on the terror they had inflicted on the
population why only 10 million?
How much influence did this father have on this lad?
But most of all, does any one know that we have an election campaign going
on in the States that are so important or we are all thinking about the
sniper? So we have a French tanker blown up, we have Australians blown up in
Bali, both countries opposed to going to Baghdad and we have Washington
where the numbers are too low for the war terrorised.
Like you said the jury is still out there.
Em
The Mulindwas communication group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy"
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: Applying Sharia in Washington DC - the 17yr old
> In a message dated 10/25/02 3:06:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << Even the 17 year old should be fried?
> Em >>
> Good question! although I skirted addressing him specifically, the fact is
in
> Maryland he will not be liable to face capital punishment although in
> Virginia we have no such compunction.
> The extent of his culpability is yet undetermined besides the fact that he
> was influenced by his dad could well be an extenuating circumstance.
> The alternative point of view though would be that he is at least of age
to
> determine that this was not right and could conceivably have called in for
> the reward - the argument being that at least if he didn't know killing
> innocent people was bad, he should at minimum understand that half a
million
> dollars is good!
> Who knows whether having tasted blood he will now become a recidivist and
a
> major threat to society if left around?
> I guess the jury is still out on this.
>
>
