Emmanuel Allan Katongole

It is true that most of the products used are a danger to the survival of the ecosystem but then we weigh the options of doing without one and the options of going with it.

 At the checkout supper markets, sometime you are asked if you would prefer �plastic or a paper bag�.  It is still the choice between Pepsi and Coke.  True, plastic is not easily done with when it comes to our environment but if you go for that brown paper bag, another tree will be cut and that is why an environmentalist will opt for plastic.  For now, let�s kill the mosquitoes using DDT openly other than accepting millions of dollars from Super powers to dump their waste in secrecy.

DDT a Banned Insecticide

DDT the first of the chlorinated organic insecticides, was originally prepared in 1873, but it was not until 1939 that Paul Muller of Geigy Pharmaceutical in Switzerland discovered the effectiveness of DDT as an insecticide he was awarded the Nobel Prize in medicine and physiology in 1948 for this discovery).

DDT structure

The use of DDT increased enormously on a worldwide basis after World War II, primarily because of its effectiveness against the mosquito that spreads malaria and lice that carry typhus. The World Health Organization estimates that during the period of its use approximately 25 million lives were saved. DDT seemed to be the ideal insecticide it is cheap and of relatively low toxicity to mammals (oral LD50 is 300 to 500 mg/kg). However, problems related to extensive use of DDT began to appear in the late 1940s. Many species of insects developed resistance to DDT, and DDT was also discovered to have a high toxicity toward fish.

The chemical stability of DDT and its fat solubility compounded the problem. DDT is not metabolized very rapidly by animals; instead, it is deposited and stored in the fatty tissues. The biological half-life of DDT is about eight years; that is, it takes about eight years for an animal to metabolize half of the amount it assimilates. If ingestion continues at a steady rate, DDT builds up within the animal over time.

The use of DDT was banned in the United States in 1973, although it is still in use in some other parts of the world. The buildup of DDT in natural waters is a reverisble process: the EPA reported a 90% reduction of DDT in Lake Michigan fish by 1978 as a result of the ban.

 Other Molecules of the Month

Copyright Karl Harrison 1996 and 1997.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Omar Kezimbira
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ugnet_: Uganda Has Gone Back To Deadly DDT- By E.A. Katongole-Canada

 

LETTER TO THE NEW VISION EDITOR BY EMMANUEL ALLAN KATONGOLE-MONTREAL-CANADA 27/11/2002

Uganda has gone back to deadly DDT!

MINISTER: Jim Muhwezi. Aware?

SIR� The willingness of Uganda�s health ministry to consider the use of DDT to fight against mosquitoes/malaria is disturbing. It is commendable to try and eliminate malaria; but at what cost? Perhaps the public should be informed about the effects of DDT to decide for themselves. Here are a few of the effects of DDT, according to the EPA:
l A human carcinogen that may cause non-Hodgkin�s lymphoma, breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, Hodgkin�s disease, multiple myeloma pancreatic, skin, lung or liver cancer. It degrades the immune system, among other dangers.
l Reproductive effects: Potentially causes chromosomal aberrations, interferes with the healthy balance of estrogen and testosterone, is passed in breast milk to infants, shortens the duration of lactation in women, leads to erectile dysfunction, causes feminisation in animal species, softens the shells of bird eggs, and is an endocrine disrupter.
lAnd theses are just the known effects, what else it does,! God only knows!
DDT is an organo-chlorine compound that is extremely persistent in the environment and has the unique property of concentrating in the fatty tissue of mammals. When DDT gets into our bodies, it is stored primarily in such fatty organs as the adrenals, testes, and the thyroid gland.
DDT has a devastating effect on birds and fish. The risks presented by DDT need to be carefully weighed relative to the risk of controlling malaria.
Canadian wildlife researchers in British Columbia have found that even though DDT has not been used there for 40 years, DDT levels in bird's eggs are higher than levels reported 20 years ago, which suggests that although it is dangerous
to present generations,
it may be more devastating
to future generations.

Emmanuel Allan Katongole
Montreal, Canada

Published on: Wednesday, 27th November, 2002

Email this article to a friend.

Immigration Maade Easy

 

 

 

 

 

 

© Copyright The New Vision 2000-2002. All rights reserved.

 


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date:
11/8/2002


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/2002

Reply via email to