But what do physicist say about this Einstein relativity theory - or it is just accepted as it is ? See below my own thoughts about it .
> The inner http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=usnews/20021202/ts_usnews/the_inner_einstein The ----- This causality - or those Generative Mechanisms and Natural Kinds processes? Einstein came to a conclusion that relative velocity of bodies affects the simultaneity of events. Therefore energy conservation will equal mass conservation. One is compelled to assume that when a light particle i.e. a photon hits a plant leaf the gain in leaf body mass will be the same as the amount of energy conserved under the process. If that were true, then the proposition above can�??t be fully understood if let us say, we transpose it against the loss of gravitational energy with the creation of particles in the above example. Certainly an atom in a leaf will absorb a photon, transform it into other substances like water of which loss one might assume naturally gives to an empirical explanation. Then, what does the Newtonian gravitations law tells us? Gravitation mass of the object is the power to attract other massive bodies according to the product of the masses in inverse ration to the square of the distance. Is a photon a body in this respect? therefore light has gravitational force i.e. to attract plants to grow upwards. Now imagine a photon particle swiftly moving at light speed, moving closer to a leaf and the leaf in the process is held in position without bending down wards as it gains in mass conservation from light energy since plants do not emit but transform light to food energy (mass) i.e. water carbon dioxide etc. So what is the argument between Niels Bohr and Mr. Albert Einstein? Think of absorption and emission in body mass and gravitation alike, for in this example above, leafs are not emitting but rather change photons through photosynthesis process which will be a gain in mass rather than emission hence difficult to argue for an equal loss in mass. This is true as far as biochemistry is concerned. Chemical compounds are not assumed to be light particles produced hence radiated in the above process. Does quantum theory explain fully the things of nature like empirical account of atomic processes in Einstein�??s assumed development of a quantum theory? Why �?~am I asking? Yes, because it is said at least in physics that radiation process involves two processes the emission or absorption of singular light quanta or photons equalling some amount of energy irrespective of their NATURAL KINDS. Physics above entails two processes, while biochemistry entails absorption and material transformation, which actually is NOT the same as emission. I might be wrong! This is true as far as the Photosynthesis process allows green plants to use the energy of light to convert to carbon dioxide and water into the simple sugar glucose. Does the above statement arise Brian Ellis natural kinds? So what exactly is meant with quantum mechanics? Philosophy of sciences: Einstein�??s reply to (Niels Bohr 1949) criticisms 1949 "The assertion of the existence of definite time-instant for the disintegration makes sense only if I can in principle determine this time-instant empirically. Such an assertion, however, involves a definite disturbance of the system in which we are interested, so that the result of the determination does not permit a conclusion concerning the status of the undistributed system. The supposition, therefore, that a radioactive atom has a definite disintegration- time is not justified by anything whatsoever; it is, therefore not demonstrated either that the Psi-function cannot be conceived as a complete description of the individual system. The entire alleged difficulty proceeds from the fact that one postulates something not observable as REAL." A very interesting debate Ellis and Bhaskar would say Bwanika. __________ bwanika Logon & Join in ug-academicsdb discussion list http://www.coollist.com/subcribe.html List ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your Email address: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ url: http://uhpl.uganda.co.ug http://pub59.ezboard.com/fugandamanufacturersassociationfrm1
