Netters,

When will the Uganda's political debate evolve beyond 'federo'?

I am an avowed federalist, but I'd hate to "be given" federo as a bribe for my vote and/or political support.

Federal thinking  and governance ought be divorced from parties, because it can and should exist on its own  merit.  The danger of identifying it with the party de jour, is that its very existence will be threatened when party X or UPC win a particular election. I'd hate federo to become a political yoyo or football, that is why I earlier called for a somewhat more stable or permanent Constitution. 

Even though many times we act like we do not like each other very much, I'd hope that we can all realize that our individual feelings notwithstanding, fate threw us together a century or so ago. We ought  have the political maturity to find some general or basic agreements on how we desire to be governed -- irrespective of party / religious allegiancies or ethnic affiliation.

This is a very critical issue because the truth of the matteris that in Uganda's politics of 'eating', for 99% of the time, 99% of us are on the fringes, with only a select few on the gravy-train at any one time.  This will always be true regardless of who happens in power, just like it is true everywhere, be it under capitalism, socialism, communism or whatever ism. Reason? Simple. We cannot all be in power, not at once anyway. It has been so for quite a while in the history of humanity. Ancient Greeks perhaps were the exception to this, but their City-States were miniscule compared to Uganda or any other present day state.

If you doubt me, flash back to the last elections: recall the the pictures of citizens clad in tattered clothes that had not seen water and soap  since they were picked-out in 'Mivumba', (frankly some of the bodies too!), shoeless feet, but yet carrying huge placard of 'NO CHANGE'. What irony!  I doubt many of these 'NO CHANGERS' have since seen their victorious candidates upclose since that time.

I think that if we keep our ambitions reasonable and manageable, e.g. schools, hospitals, citizens of Uganda should not die of jiggers in the 21st Century, etc should at no less than a a given minimum level -- regardless of who happens to be in power, etc etc we  come up with a minimal document, a constituttion if you like, that can be respected by all parties. Were this to happen we'd have moved a giant step forward.

Surely it is not too much to expect not to be "given" what is already rightly ours, or is it?

I very much hope that we, Ugandans, will not squander the next fourty years, as we have the last fourty (since Independence!) on debating federo with political parties performing a political-striptease with it to get votes, support etc. Lets get it and then move on!

Life is simply too short to be squandered so wantonly chasing our proverbial tails, lets put some value to it.

What say you?

----Original Message Follows----
From: "zakoomu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FedsNet] Re: Parties tell Movt. they want Federo
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:46:50 -0000
Mr. Kibuka,
Political Parties might win over Buganda especially with FEDERO
included as one of the main agendas. This is a good sign for us
federalists. However, how can we get "donor support"? The pressure
for federo on Mov't is growing, but we will have a better position
if we had donors backing us. Don't you think that we should try to
talk to donors on how their money will help the country by
articulating how federo will help speed up development?? Does
anyone see what I see??
Zakoomu R.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "M. Kibuka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Call conference, parties tell Movt Want federo, war on agenda
> By Monitor Reporter
> Opposition groups yesterday called for a national conference to
discuss
> constitutional reforms among other things.
> In a joint statement, the seven opposition groups said the
government should
> abandon its "unilateral, undemocratic and militaristic approach to
national
> problems."
> The statement was signed by; Mr Nsubuga Nsambu for the
Conservative Party,
> Imam Kasozi for the Justice Forum, Mr Chapaa Karuhanga for the
National
> Democrats Forum, Mr Sam Njuba for the Reform Agenda, Mr Fredrick
Juuko for
> the Free Movement, and Mr James Rwanyarare for the Uganda People's
Congress.
> The slot for the Democratic Party was not signed.
> Sources said DP did not sign because the statement also said that
the
> current Constitutional Review Commission has no legitimate
mandate, a
> position they did not agree with. The DP however agreed with all
the other
> clauses.
> The statement said the national conference should address
constitutional
> reforms with emphasis on the right to associate, which From Page 1
> usually refers to freedom of political parties.
> The groups also want a speedy repeal of `repressive laws' like the
Movement
> Act, Political Parties and Organisations Act, Anti-Terrorism Act,
and
> electoral laws.
> They also want a negotiated settlement of all current civil wars.
> They want the conference to also address the central-local
government
> relations, including the question of federalism.
>
> February 19, 2003 13:16:26
> http://www.monitor.co.ug/news.php?record_number=1&show=Headlines
> Please register your support for "Federalism for all" today!


Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.

Reply via email to