|
Although the "U.S. President" has little or no significant power -
since it's the media-money monopoly that runs the show (Eisenhower called it the military-industrial complex, Buckminster Fuller called it GRUNCH or LAWCAP) - is there any point in holding this titular office? The pay is okay, and the fringe benefits are excellent, but... aren't there better things to do with one's life? Most of the time, President Eisenhower played golf. But he did manage to stop the British, French and Zionists from invading Suez in 1956. And he delivered an excellent farewell address. Presidents Kennedy and Carter attempted to make some significant changes, such as dissolving the CIA and America's addiction to oil. But look what the CIA, the Mossad and the world banksters did to JFK and Carter. Physical assassination and character assassination, among other ploys. These days, lots of the usual puppet politicians are scrambling to announce that they're running for President in the Democratic Party. It's unlikely that the media-money monopoly will pay much attention to anyone who's not a Republicrat. And it's part of the so-called "conspiracy" to have a Democratic Party "good cop" replace the Republican Party "bad cop" in 2004 or 2008, depending largely on the price of gas and oil at the time. It's the "economy", stupid! The more Gross National Pollution emitted by the USA, the more complacent most of our addicted citizens become. As I overheard during Election Fraud 2000 while visiting http://cfr.org , GM's Robert McNamara instructed NPR's William Shirer, "Anyone but Nader." You see, it's not a "conspiracy", it's simply the way things are done in the corporate world. Well, although I'd rather be doing other things than playing President, it's very insulting to citizens to have bribed, blackmailed and incompetent puppet politicians claiming to represent us. As a matter of honor, if we're to have any President, at least he or she should be at least as sensible as an average farmer or carpenter. Lawyers and MBAs need not apply. So far, nobody that I've heard of has challenged poor George W. Bush as the so-called "Republican" candidate for 2004. I feel sorry for Dubya, since the whole world is laughing at him and he never wanted to play politics anyway. He just wants to drink beer and watch baseball, not be the patsy for the global political-economic meltdown. Yesterday I called the Republicans to inquire about running for so- called "election" in the GOP. After all, I explained to their baffled bureacrats, I advocate abolishing all personal income taxes, reducing the size of the federal government by more than 90%, empowering State and local governments, protecting ALL of the Bill of Rights, and accepting no bribes. Doesn't that make me an excellent Republican? Some of them agreed, that would certainly be a very appealing policy. But how can you run without accepting "campaign contributions" from PACs? I replied that bribery is unlawful and will eventually land all these puppet politicians and their patrons in prison. That didn't endear me with the finance staff, whose job is to solicit and launder bribes. Hmmmmm.... To play the game or not? That is the question. Well, if I do play the game, I'll accept no bribes. As for financing such a campaign, the most I'll accept is about $100 silver dollars (no Federal Reserve Corporation debt-dollars, please) from individual human citizens of the United States - citizens who accept nothing more than decent leadership in exchange. What this country needs is a radical republican like Thomas Jefferson. The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni Uganda is in Anarchy" Le groupe de transmission de Mulindwas " avec Yoweri Museveni, Ouganda est dans anarchy " |
