Back to the Kibaale issue

wretched: IDPs on the run in Lugogo

I am amazed at the level of xenophobia in this country. You should have seen the language of the text messages and phone calls I received because of my thoughts last week. Anyway, for the record, let me state that my beef on the issue of Bakiga in Kibaale is with our national leadership.
It�s got nothing to do with the land grievance of the Banyoro and in fact I think it is a legitimate one. The only problem is that in blaming the Bakiga for the land problems of Bunyoro is misdirected anger. History clearly states that the Banyoro were dispossessed of this land by the invading colonial forces supported by the Baganda. This land was then distributed to various Baganda generals and administrators as a reward for their support of the colonial war and administration. This injustice was never reversed, not even by the hoax that was the 1964 referendum that purported to return the lost counties back to Bunyoro.
In 1979, the Baganda landlords who own vast tracts of land in Bunyoro learnt that the effect of the referendum was to transfer administrative authority of the counties from Buganda to Bunyoro. The land remained in the hands of absentee landlords in Buganda who then proceeded to mortgage it to finance their less contentious businesses in Kampala. Others decided to flog it on the market on a willing seller/buyer basis and this is where your average Mukiga comes in to buy.
These then encouraged their relatives to migrate to Bunyoro and buy land, which was available for sale. The return on this investment has been impressive considering the level of success that many of the migrants have achieved. This, it seems to me, is what has ticked off the groups in Kibaale that are agitating for the eviction of Bakiga from the land. How else does one explain the xenophobia that was used by these elements remove a duly elected leader purely on the basis that he was a Mukiga?
There is of course the group from Toro, which was resettled in Kibaale in an area formerly designated as a game reserve. This turned to be a hard one for the Banyoro to swallow. They argued that since the government had failed to redress the injustice of land ownership by absentee landlords, they should have been given first priority to settle on this land. Let me say that I identify with this sentiment although this need not have been done either to the exclusion of or the disadvantage of the Bakiga. Everyone could have been accommodated in the resettlement deal. The other reason for deserving first priority is that the Banyoro have first claim as the descendants of the area. Apart from being a stupid and self-serving argument it is hardly borne out by history.
The failure here was that of government and not the imaginary notion that Bakiga have moved from the south-west of this country to grab land in Bunyoro. The government failed to uphold the right of its citizens to live in Toro on the grounds that they were not born there. They compounded this by accepting to resettle these people anywhere and thus making the point that government can compromise on this issue. Now I hear that there is a proposal to resettle these people in Kyankwanzi. I think that this merely postponing the problem and that eventually these people will wind up settling outside parliament. The answer is for the government to enforce the right of the Bakiga to stay in Kibaale on land they have acquired lawfully. It should then work on the politics of ensuring that this solution is accepted.
The other thrust of the Kasirivu argument is that the Banyoro were willing to be generous in hosting the Bakiga because there was a surplus of land. Now that their own populations are growing they are justified in driving out the Bakiga to create living space for their progeny. Those of us who live in a modern economy believe that land is a commodity to be exchanged on the market. This kind of sentimental approach normally leads to low productivity because it is not used optimally. So if the land in the area can no longer support the population of the area the answer is to offer alternative settlement opportunities for the Banyoro.
I therefore believe that the solution is to protect the Bakiga who have acquired land lawfully. The other is for the government to address the issue of injustice to Banyoro whose land was forcefully taken and is now in the hands of absentee landlords from Buganda. This can be bought back and given to the Banyoro by government. This discussion however needs to be conducted in a sober manner, and not with the likes of those masquerading in the name of Bunyoro patriotism that have added arrogance to the reasons for evicting Bakiga.
Eends

Published on: Sunday, 8th June, 2003

            The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy"
            Groupe de communication Mulindwas
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"

Reply via email to