Matovu,while you acknowledge your enthusiasm of uttering
false information,I think the correct response to your getting
the real truth NOT the PROPAGANDA that is consuming most
of your ilk is that you are always wrong and biased,instead of the
Fugee being right for the first time.
Next time do not plagiarize information to serve your Propaganda.
Thanks.
Kipenji.
===========================================================
Lutimba Matovu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lutimba Matovu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fugee,
I copied the text and I believed it to be true. I
reservedly appologised and thanked Roy for the
clariffication.
For the first time you were right.
LM
--- The Fugee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Matovu,
>
> The report in the link you provided does not mention
> Uganda. It states:
> -
>
> "Biafra's independence was recognized by Tanzania,
> Zambia, Gabon, and
> the Ivory Coast, but it was compromised in the eyes
> of most African
> states by the approval of South Africa, Southern
> Rhodesia, and Portugal.
> Britain extended diplomatic support and limited
> military assistance to
> the federal government. The Soviet Union became an
> important source of
> military equipment for Nigeria. Modern Soviet-built
> warplanes, flown by
> Egyptian and British pilots, interdicted supply
> flights and inflicted
> heavy casualties during raids on Biafran urban
> centers. In line with its
> policy of noninvolvement, the United States
> prohibited the sale of
> military goods to either side while continuing to
> recognize the FMG."
>
> As usual you are engaged in manufacturing "evidence"
> to prove your lie!
> Let us see what other Ugandanetters think of this.
>
> The Fugee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Lutimba Matovu
> Sent: 16 July 2003 18:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ugnet_: Re: On the UPC #2
>
> Fugee,
>
> Bwino is there, visit,
>
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod101/ops/war/biafra.htm
> "Biafra's independence was recognized by Tanzania,
> Zambia, Uganda, Gabon, and the Ivory Coast, but it
> was
> compromised in the eyes of most African states by
> the
> approval of South Africa, Southern Rhodesia, and
> Portugal"
>
> LM
>
>
>
>
> --- The Fugee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Matovu,
> >
> > Please do not insist of portraying your ignorance
> > and self deceit so
> > shamelessly. UPC never recognised Ujukwu's Biafra
> > though was admittedly
> > involved in trying to solve the crisis in Nigeria.
> > Secondly being
> > overthrown by a small group of armed men has never
> > been a sign of
> > unpopularity just as shooting ones way to power
> and
> > suppressing
> > organised opposition has never been proof of
> > popularity.
> >
> > We shall surely see how much support UPC has in a
> > free and fair
> > competitive multiparty elections, that is when you
> > Movementists gather
> > enough courage to face the people only with ideas
> > and programmes on a
> > level playing field.
> >
> > The Fugee
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Lutimba Matovu
> > Sent: 16 July 2003 01:00
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: ugnet_: Re: On the UPC #2
> >
> > Roy,
> >
> > What do you mean UPC was a strong supporter of pan
> > africanism? Dont be fooled. UPC for instance had
> > recognised Emenkwa Ojukwu's biafra to break away
> > from
> > the federal republic of Nigeria. Is that to you
> pan
> > africanism?
> >
> > UPC only thrived on deceit and dividing the people
> > and
> > whne they were found out, they were thrown out not
> > once but twice.
> >
> > LM
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > As a result of a recent digital dialog with Br.
> > > Matek, the Chief of
> > > Washington Bureau of the UPC, we both affirmed
> > these
> > > points:
> > >
> > > 1. That suppression of UPC activity inside
> > Uganda,
> > > and the attempt to
> > > undermine the Washington Bureau Chief authority,
> > > were both indicators of the fear of
> > > the UPC line on the part of certain elements in
> > > Ugandan society and possibly
> > > their foreign backers. Br. Matek referenced
> our
> > > young ancestor, the martyr
> > > Omowale Malcolm X on the point of the fifth
> column
> > > activities.
> > >
> > > 2. That the support the UPC gave the
> > Stanleyville
> > > government after the
> > > assassination of the legitimate leader of the
> > Congo,
> > > PM Patrice Lumumba, was
> > > indicative of the UPC's principled support for
> the
> > > Lumumbaists and for
> > > Pan-Africanism generally, beginning with it's
> > > governments military support on behalf of
> > > the martyred Prime Minister while he was alive.
> > We
> > > both agreed that this
> > > legacy of the UPC in the Congo was an enormous
> > plus
> > > for both Uganda and the larger
> > > African world; and for humanity in general.
> > >
> > >
> > > I thank you for your patience and forbearance in
> > > this matter.
> > >
> > >
> > > Roy Walker
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > LM
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
> =====
> LM
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
=====
LM
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?�Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger
